www.nuitdorient.com
DERNIERES ATTEINTES AUX VESTIGES DU 1ER TEMPLE
Par Nadav Shragar, écrivain, journaliste à Haaretz depuis 1983
Article publié par JCPA-ICA le 27 février
2008- vol 7 N°32
Traduction partielle et adaptation par
Albert Soued pour www.nuitdorient.com
Voir aussi les
50 derniers articles et les
archives gratuites et les infos sur le Temple
Alors que les pays arabes qui ont tous un
régime autoritaire et islamisant souhaitent la disparition d'un état juif
démocratique en leur sein depuis 60 ans, le Waqf,
lui, cherche à éliminer toute trace de judéité sur le Mont du Temple, avec
la complicité plus ou moins tacite du gouvernement israélien.
Le maître mot de la police de Jérusalem,
c'est "le calme et la tranquillité plutôt que les vestiges
archéologiques"… et cela dure depuis mai 1967.
- En été 1999, le Waqf
entreprit de rénover les galeries sous la Mosquée d'Al Aqsa,
connues sous le nom "le vieux al Aqsa" (al Aqsa al Qadim). Ces galeries
contiennent un double passage, seul vestige souterrain, intact dans sa totalité,
du 2ème Temple. 4 dômes ont été préservés dans "ce double
passage", avec des inscriptions gravées dans la pierre, travail des
artisans juifs d'il y a 2000 ans. Or ces galeries appartiennent en totalité à
la nouvelle mosquée d'al Aqsa.
- En Novembre 1999, le Waqf entreprit de creuser un énorme trou au sud-est du Mont
du Temple, une superficie de 1600m2 sur une profondeur de 15 m. Cette excavation a
dévoilé 4 anciennes arches, de 4m de large et de 10 m de haut. Les débris ont
rempli 200 camions et ont été déversés dans des décharges dans la vallée du Kidron et à el Azaria, près de Maalé Adoumim.
- De sérieux dégâts aux vestiges sont de
nouveau constatés en été 2007. Le Waqf a demandé
l'autorisation de creuser une tranchée de 350 m sur 1,2 m de profondeur, sur le mont du Temple pour
remplacer des canalisations électriques. L'Autorité des Antiquités a révélé que
lors des travaux on a découvert des traces d'activité humaine sur une strate de
terre, des débris de poterie datant du 1er Temple. Vingt mètres au
sud des marches à l'Est du Dôme du Rocher, on a découvert un mur massif qui
serait, selon les experts, le mur méridional de la Cour des Femmes du 2ème
Temple.
- En dépit des pétitions légales
introduites par le Comité de prévention de la destruction des Antiquités du
Mont du Temple, la Cour Suprême d'Israël n'est pas intervenue, et malgré les
violations continues des lois régissant les antiquités par les groupes
islamiques. Le Waqf et d'autres groupes islamiques
ont profité de cette absence pour démolir toute trace de vestiges juifs sur le
Mont du Temple. Et c'est la police israélienne qui s'oppose à tout contrôle des
archéologues de l'Autorité des Antiquités, recevant ses ordres du bureau du 1er
ministre et du Procureur général.
- Depuis 2004, les archéologues Dr Gabi Barkai et Zachi Zweig ont tamisé
tous les gravats jetés depuis 8 ans par le Waqf dans
la décharge de la vallée de Kidron. On y a trouvé de
nombreux vestiges datant du 8ème/7ème s avant l'ère
courante (vaisselle en albâtre, poids, poterie…), de l'époque des rois de
Judée, notamment un sceau portant des lettres en hébreu ancien des derniers
jours du 1er Temple.
- En 2002, un archéologue hongrois a
visité le mont du Temple où il a trouvé un morceau d'une tablette en pierre,
fragment d'une inscription monumentale en latin portant le nom de Flavius Silva, gouverneur de la province de Judée entre -70
et -73 et général qui a mené le siège de Masada.
©
www.nuitdorient.com
par le groupe boaz,copyright autorisé sous
réserve de mention du site
THE LATEST
DAMAGE TO ANTIQUITIES ON THE TEMPLE MOUNT
By Nadav Shragai, author of At the
Crossroads, the Story of the Tomb of Rachel (Jerusalem Studies, 2005); The
Mount of Contention, the Struggle for the Temple Mount, Jews and Muslims,
Religion and Politics since 1967 (Keter, 1995); and
"Jerusalem is Not the Problem, It is the Solution," in Mister Prime
Minister: Jerusalem, ed. Moshe Amirav (Carmel and the
Florsheimer Institute, 2005). He has been writing for
the Israeli daily newspaper Ha'aretz since 1983.
Published by Institute
for Contemporary Affairs- Jerusalem Brief
Vol. 7, No. 32 - 27 February 2008
- In the summer of
1999, the Waqf undertook renovations on the galleries
beneath the Al-Aqsa Mosque, what is known as
"old Al-Aqsa." They contained the
"double passageway," the only passageway preserved in its entirety
from the time of the Second
Temple. Four domes were
preserved in the double passageway with inscriptions carved into the stone,
work done by Jewish artisans 2,000 years ago. The passageways became integral
parts of a new mosque, Al-Aqsa al-Qadim.
- Serious damage
was again done in the summer of 2007. The Waqf
requested authorization to dig a ditch dozens of meters long to replace power
lines. Subsequently, the Israel Antiquities Authority issued details about the
uncovering of a "sealed stratum of human activity," a layer of earth
with pottery shards found broken in situ, where they had remained without
change since the days of the First Temple. Twenty meters south of the eastern
steps of the Dome of the Rock, a massive, ancient wall was uncovered which,
according to expert opinion examining its location and size, could very well be
the southern wall of the Women's Court of the Second Temple.
- Despite the many
legal petitions filed, mainly by the Committee for the Prevention of
Destruction of Antiquities on the Temple
Mount, the Israel Supreme
Court has not intervened, even though its members are well aware that Islamic
groups continually violate the laws governing construction and antiquities. The
Waqf, the Islamic Movement, and various Islamic
groups have exploited the situation and have seriously damaged Temple Mount
antiquities. The Israel Police plays the dominant Israeli role and its
activities are coordinated with the prime minister's office and the office of
the attorney general.
- Since 2004,
archaeologist Dr. Gabi Barkai and Zachi
Zweig have been sifting through the rubble the Waqf
removed from the Temple Mount to the Kidron Valley eight years ago. Among the
ancient finds were many belonging to the late period of the Kings of Judea (8th
and 7th centuries BCE). The most striking find was a seal impression with
letters in the ancient Hebrew script of the last days of the First Temple.
- In 2002,
Hungarian archaeologist Tibor Grull
visited the Temple Mount where he found part of a stone tablet, a
fragment from a monumental Latin inscription which bore the name of Flavius
Silva, Governor of the Province of Judea in 79-73 BCE and the general who laid siege to Masada.
*
*
*
In the wake of the
1993 Oslo Accords, the Palestinian Authority (PA), through its Ministry of
Religious Endowments (Waqf), systematically eroded
the administrative role that had been assigned to the Hashemite Kingdom of
Jordan as the caretaker of Muslim shrines on the Temple
Mount in Jerusalem. In October 1994, the PA even
appointed its own mufti for Jerusalem, who
displaced Jordan's
candidate.
Even though the Oslo
Accords recognized Israel's
jurisdiction over Jerusalem, pending any change
reached through future permanent status negotiations, Israeli governments were
extremely hesitant to confront the incremental but steady PA efforts to broaden
religious control over Muslim holy sites in Jerusalem,
especially on the Temple
Mount. Furthermore, since
the entire Israeli-Palestinian peace process had been launched under U.S. auspices, a full-scale clash over the Temple Mount
could also lead to a U.S.-Israeli diplomatic crisis, which the governments in Jerusalem sought to
avoid. These considerations continued to influence Israeli decision-making even
after the outbreak of Palestinian violence in 2000, even though any expression
of Palestinian governmental authority in Jerusalem
was an outright violation of the Oslo Accords.
Is
There Israeli Supervision on the Temple
Mount?
In recent years,
the Waqf has repeatedly challenged Israel by undertaking construction projects on
the Temple Mount, many of which were unauthorized.
Yet these initiatives have undermined the archaeological heritage on the Temple Mount,
as well as the very stability of some of its structures. On May 18, 2004, the
Internal Affairs and Environment Committee of the Israeli Knesset met to
deliberate the danger of the possible collapse of the Temple Mount's
eastern wall, some of whose foundation stones had weakened and cracked.
Yehoshua Dorfman,
director of the Israel Antiquities Authority, and Micha
Ben-Nun, director of the Licensing and Inspection Department of the Jerusalem
municipality, told the committee that while they were both responsible for
routine inspection and law enforcement on the Temple Mount, in practice they
had been denied access to the Temple Mount and did not receive information
about what occurred there.
Dorfman stated that, following a directive
issued by the prime minister, the Antiquities Authority's inspection of the
archaeological sites on the Temple Mount was partial, indirect and unofficial.1
"We receive all our information about what happens...from the Israeli
police....We don't go there," he admitted. "We think we know what is
going on as far as archaeology is concerned, but to say that I genuinely
know...I wouldn't swear to it."2
Ben-Nun said that
"while the Jerusalem municipality does
have formal and statutory responsibility for the Temple Mount,
in practice we have no access and no control over what happens there. Not only that, there is what we call the 'deliberate interference'
of those who are in charge of it, whether the police or whoever, to keep us
away and to minimize our knowledge. None of the information we receive
is official and we have no way of obtaining such information. If the eastern
wall collapsed, no one would tell us. No one talks to us."3
No one familiar with
what is really happening on the Temple
Mount was surprised by
what they said, but rather by the fact that for once someone actually had said
it publicly. This situation has existed for years and is no different today.
According to instructions from Israel's
attorney general, the certified authorities must carry out routine inspections
of the Temple Mount, but in reality their powers are
limited. The Jerusalem
municipality, the Israel Police, and the Antiquities Authority were instructed
by the Attorney General to report "any serious infraction discovered in
laws governing planning or the antiquities [themselves]". However, the
attorney general forbade both the municipality and the authority from taking
steps to enforce the law (including demolition or issuing a demolition order),
to take testimony, carry out detentions, or issue indictments without prior
coordination with his office.4 In that regard, he himself was
subordinate to the prime minister, to whom he had to report before any steps
could be taken on the Temple Mount.5
The law governing
the Temple Mount is explicit regarding the full
jurisdiction of Israeli law over the location. Legal expert Dr. Shmuel Berkowitz summarized the main points in his 2006
book:6
All the laws of Israel are valid for the Temple
Mount, as it is located on ground that
has been part of the State of Israel since the unification of Jerusalem
and the enforcement of Israeli law over East Jerusalem,
including the Law of Planning and Construction, 1965, and the Antiquities Law
of 1978. As early as August 1967, the Temple Mount
and the Western Wall were designated as antiquities, as part of the Old City of
Jerusalem and its environs. According to Article 29(A) of the Antiquities Law,
no action is to be carried out, including actions of construction, demolition,
earthworks, and change or dismantling of an antiquity without authorization
from the Antiquities Authority.
According to the
law, "Archaeological activities at...sites, which are legally defined
as holy sites, are not dependent on the sole discretion of the IAA
Director-General. Any changes (e.g., excavation, construction, preservation of
ancient walls, etc.) require approval of the Ministerial Committee for Holy
Places, which consists of the Ministers of Justice, Education and
Religious Affairs."7
However, the
discrepancy between the letter of the law and what happens in practice is vast.
The
dominant, decisive factor on the Temple
Mount is the Israel
Police.
A high-ranking officer in the police once said:
On the Temple Mount
there is a delicate relationship between the Waqf and
other groups, on the one hand, and the State of Israel, on the other. It is a
give and take situation, carrot and stick. As far as the Antiquities Law is
concerned, sometimes we prefer to settle things quietly with Islamic groups
through private arrangements that remain private. We pay a price for that,
sometimes a high one. It is a known fact that antiquities are being damaged on
the Temple Mount. The alternative is a riot every
other day. Those in authority have to decide what they prefer, and we prefer
quiet because, with all due respect to the antiquities, the top priority of the
State of Israel on the Temple
Mount is quiet, not
riots, even if the antiquities pay the price. In theory, the laws of Israel govern the Temple Mount,
but in reality, the various authorities are careful in their enforcement
because religiously it is a very sensitive location.8
For the same
reason, the Israel Supreme Court treats infractions of planning and
construction with kid gloves, and does not compel the authorities to enforce
the law. For years, the court has respected the sensitivity of the state
towards the Temple
Mount, and displayed
understanding for the "considerations" it exercises. One after
another, it has rejected appeals lodged by various Jewish groups claiming that
the Temple Mount
is of particular importance to them, regardless of whether they are the Temple Mount
and Land of Israel
Faithful movement or the far more widely accepted Committee
for the Prevention of the Destruction of Antiquities on the Temple Mount.
The result, in any case, is that the antiquities are repeatedly damaged, and
Israeli law and sovereignty are repeatedly flouted.
In the early 1990s,
the Antiquities Authority unofficially inspected the activities of the Waqf on the Temple
Mount. Dr. Dan Bahat, who was the district archaeologist for Jerusalem for
many years, reported on this inspection to the Supreme Court.9 One
of the informal understandings between the Antiquities Authority archaeologists
and the Waqf was that the Waqf
would keep the authority informed of its plans, but nothing was ever done
formally because officially the Waqf does not
recognize the legitimacy of Israeli control of eastern Jerusalem.10
During those years, Antiquities Authority inspectors had a fairly free hand on
the Temple Mount. They could walk around, enter where they pleased, and
document and take photographs of what they saw.
In September 1996,
the opening of the northern exit of the Hasmonean
tunnel, an extension of the Western Wall tunnel, changed the situation
completely. After the Western Wall tunnel riots,11
Antiquities Authority inspectors were limited to the trails reserved for
tourists and were denied access to the rest of the Temple Mount.
In other words, they were only granted partial access to the site and were
forbidden to take photographs. Important underground sites were treated by the Waqf as its own property and were closed to Israeli
inspectors, including Solomon's Stables, the old Al-Aqsa
mosque and the Triangle Gate, and the area of the above-ground Golden Gate. With the outbreak of the Second Intifada in
September 2000, even this partial access for authority inspectors ended as the Waqf cut off all Israeli entry into the Temple Mount.
Since September
1996, the Waqf has cooperated only with the Israel
Police. Whenever the Antiquities Authority wants to examine a site on the
Temple Mount, it has to coordinate its activities with the police, and the
police do not always cooperate since their top priority is quiet, not
antiquities. Sometimes, the inspectors have resorted to subterfuge by
disguising themselves as policemen or tourists. In view of the damage done
repeatedly to the antiquities, the Committee for the Prevention of Destruction
of Antiquities on the Temple
Mount was established
early in 2000. Its membership includes author A.B. Yehoshua,
former Supreme Court President Meir Shamgar, former
State Comptroller Miriam Ben-Porat, former Tel Aviv
Mayor Shlomo Lahat, the
late Jerusalem Mayor Teddy Kollek, Meir Dagan (before
he became head of the Mossad), and well-known
archaeologists, scholars, and retired high-ranking army officers.
Damage
Done to Temple Mount Antiquities in 1999
The damage done to
the antiquities on the Temple
Mount has been substantial.
In the summer of 1999, the Waqf undertook renovations
on the galleries beneath the Al-Aqsa Mosque, what is
known as "old Al-Aqsa." They contained the
"double passageway," the only passageway preserved in its entirety
from the time of the Second Temple, from Hulda's Gates
(blocked up today) in the southern wall of the Temple
Mount to the square in front of the Temple, the main
thoroughfare in ancient times. Four domes were preserved in the double
passageway with inscriptions carved into the stone, work done by Jewish
artisans 2,000 years ago.12
The Waqf excavated extensively and made irreversible changes,
and the passageways became integral parts of a new mosque, Al-Aqsa al-Qadim.13 Members of the Antiquities
Authority in 2000 called it "an archaeological
distortion."14
In November 1999,
the Waqf and the Israeli Islamic Movement dug an
enormous pit southeast of the Temple
Mount, 1,600 square meters
in area and 15 meters
deep.15 It exposed four ancient arches,
four meters wide and ten meters high. The debris from the excavation was loaded
onto 200 trucks which shuttled back and forth without interference, disposing
of thousands of tons of earth rich in archaeological remains from all the
periods of the Temple
Mount. The earth was
dumped into the Kidron Valley
and the city garbage dump at El-Azaria, near Ma'ale Adumim.
The Waqf had received authorization for excavation at the Temple Mount's
southeastern corner to construct an emergency exit
for the new underground mosque (which had formerly been Solomon's Stables).
Authorization was given to widen the mosque's main entrance to a maximum of two
meters. The work was conditional on Antiquities Authority inspection, and
included only two arches. The Waqf had no
authorization to excavate to the depth and width actually completed.
Supervision for the excavation was non-existent. Heavy equipment was used,
including bulldozers, in violation of the accepted norms at archaeological
sites, wiping out and removing entire strata. At the government meeting held to
discuss the issue, Attorney General Elyakim
Rubinstein called the Waqf excavation a swift kick
aimed at the history of the Jewish people. Antiquities Authority director Amir Drori called it "an archaeological crime."16
More
Damage in 2007
Serious damage was
again done to antiquities on the Temple
Mount in the summer of
2007. The Waqf requested authorization to dig a ditch
dozens of meters long, eastward towards the hill on which the Dome of the Rock
is built, to replace power lines. The work was carried out by small tractors
and hydraulic shovels. Members of the Antiquities Authority occasionally
visited the site but were of the opinion that the earth was ordinary soil and
that there was no danger to archaeological remains. They paid no attention to
the repeated warnings of members of the Committee for the Prevention of
Destruction of Antiquities on the Temple
Mount. The work was
finished, the new electricity lines were laid, and the ditch was filled in.
Subsequently, the
Antiquities Authority issue a formal statement which included details about a
"sealed stratum of human activity," a layer of earth which, according
to archaeological assessment, "has been preserved as a homogeneous whole,
and even the pottery shards found there were broken in situ, and had remained
without change since the days of the First Temple."17
The announcement
caused a great deal of excitement in the archaeological communities in Israel and
abroad. Although the announcement mentioned nothing about the discretion
exercised by the Antiquities Authority, it was clear that a mistake had been
made. Initially, the members of the authority thought there were no antiquities
and allowed a tractor to be used. Some of them said informally that it was
entirely possible that during the excavations other "sealed strata"
had been damaged. Following the authority's announcement, the Knesset State
Control Committee decided to turn the issue of the Waqf
excavations on the Temple Mount over to the State Comptroller for examination,
as well as the conduct of the authorities in Israel in their dealings with the Waqf.
Antiquities
in the Rubble
It is only too
evident that the on-going Waqf excavations on the Temple Mount,
which are generally carried out without archaeological supervision of any kind,
have severely damaged antiquities from many periods. Since 2004, archaeologist
Dr. Gabi Barkai and Zachi
Zweig have been sifting through the rubble the Waqf
removed from the Temple Mount to the Kidron Valley eight years ago.
The project is
being carried out in the Tzurim
Valley, not far from the Mt. Scopus
campus of the Hebrew
University. The
archaeologists in charge, aided by hundreds of volunteers, occasionally
document new discoveries and publish pictures.18 An article
appearing in Ariel contained information about finds described as "very
small" because, during the excavation on the Temple Mount, the Waqf separated out the larger pieces from the rubble and
reused the ancient building blocks, since the Waqf
feared the police would prevent them from bringing new building materials to
the site.
Among the small
findings recovered were a few pre-historic flint implements, approximately ten
thousand years old; many pot shards; about a thousand ancient coins; many varicolored items of jewelry made
of various materials, including pendants, rings, bracelets, earrings and beads;
decorations for clothing; amulets; ivory and bone dice and game pieces; ivory
and mother-of-pearl furniture insets; icons and statuettes; stone and metal
weights; weapons and ammunition such as arrow heads and musket balls; broken
pieces of stone and glass utensils; stone and glass squares from floor and wall
mosaics; decorated wall hangings and fragments of decorations from buildings;
seals and seal impressions; and many other items.
The
most ancient findings were glass fragments ten thousand years old. Only a few
pottery shards and fragments of alabaster vessels were found belonging to the
Canaanite and Jebusite periods (the early and late
Bronze Age), but many items were found belonging to the late period of the
Kings of Judea (8th and 7th centuries BCE), including stone weights for
weighing silver. The most striking find was a seal impression with letters in
the ancient Hebrew script of the last days of the First Temple.
One can only
imagine what findings could have been rescued and researched if the pit dug by
the Waqf on the Temple Mount
down into Solomon's Stables had been excavated under archaeological
supervision. For example, in October 2005, Hungarian archaeologist Tibor Grull reported on a find in
the publication of the Albright Institute for Archaeological Research.19
In 2002, Grull visited the Temple Mount where he
found part of a stone tablet, a fragment from a monumental Latin inscription
which bore the name of Flavius Silva, Governor of the Province of Judea in
79-73 BCE and the general who laid siege to Masada. The Waqf
permitted Grull to photograph and document the find,
which was part of the dedicatory inscription of a triumphal arch built by the
Romans on the Temple Mount after the destruction of the Second Temple
and the city. Members of the Waqf told Grull that the fragment came from the great pit dug in
1999. According to the Antiquities Authority, other finds have made their way
to the black market.
Zweig has also
examined photographs of the ditch dug by the Waqf in
the summer of 2007. By August 2007, the ditch had reached a length of 350 meters and an
average depth of about 1.2
meters. Twenty meters south of the eastern steps of the
Dome of the Rock, a massive, ancient wall was uncovered which, according to
expert opinion examining its location and size, could very well be the southern
wall of both the Women's Court (Ezrat Nashim) and the Chamber of Oils (Lishkat
Hashmanim) that were part of the Second Temple.20
Despite the many
legal petitions filed, mainly by the Committee for the Prevention of
Destruction of Antiquities on the Temple
Mount, the Israel Supreme
Court has not intervened, even though its members are well aware that Islamic
groups continually violate the laws governing construction and antiquities. For
example, the court rejected a petition filed by the Temple Mount Faithful,
determining on January 1, 2000, that it could not rule because the issue was
"clearly the job of the government," since it had implications for
public peace and the general good.
For this reason,
the court ruled that while there was nothing to prevent it from intervening in
cases of illegal activity on the Temple
Mount, such intervention
would be the exception that proved the rule. There had to be a compelling
reason for the court to take exception to its standard procedures and trespass
on the territory of the executive authority.21 Nonetheless, current
petitions still under review by the Supreme Court are seeking its intervention
to prevent the use of tractors by the Waqf on the
Temple Mount, and to prevent any construction work at night.
The Sharon government began to reassert Israel's rights on the Temple Mount
by re-opening the area to all international visitors in August 2003. But in the
last few years, the Waqf's abuse of the
archaeological heritage of the Temple
Mount has been resumed.
The bottom line is that officially, the Temple Mount
is subject to Israeli law, while, in reality, Israeli law is not consistently
enforced there. The government, its various authorities, and the Supreme Court
accept the situation because of what is known as "the deeply religious and
sensitive nature of the site and fear for public peace if the law were enforced
there as elsewhere."
The Waqf, the Islamic Movement, and various Islamic groups have
exploited the situation and have seriously damaged Temple Mount
antiquities. The Israel Police plays the dominant Israeli role and its
activities are coordinated with the prime minister's office and the office of
the attorney general, while the Israel Antiquities Authority and the Jerusalem municipality have only limited influence over
what is done at the Temple
Mount.
*
*
*
Notes
1. Shmuel Berkowitz, Ma nora ha-makom
ha-ze, (How Awesome Is This Place) (Carta, 2006), p. 403.
2. Nadav Shragai, "Reshut ha-atikot matria"
("Director of the Antiquities Authority Issues a Warning"), Ha'aretz, May 19, 2004.
3. Announcement made
by the committee spokeswoman on May 18, 2004, and minutes of the meeting. Also mentioned in Berkowitz.
4.
Berkowitz, pp. 388-9; a document from the office of the attorney general is in
the author's possession.
5. Report from an official in the
attorney general's office to the Jerusalem
municipality, 1993.
6.
See also Nadav Shragai, Har Ha-meriva, Ha-maavak al Har Ha-bayit, Yehudim ve-Muslimim, Dat ve-Politica (The Mount of Contention, the Struggle for the
Temple Mount, Jews and Muslims, Religion and Politics) (Keter,
1995), pp. 299-306.
7. Ibid., p. 387.
8. A private
conversation with the author.
9. The author was present at the
deliberation. See Shragai, Har
Ha-meriva, p. 303.
10. The various announcements
issued by the Waqf over the years are in the
possession of the author and were reprinted in Shragai,
Har Ha-meriva.
11.
There were four days of fighting between Israel and the Palestinians on
September 24-27, 1996, during which 14 Israeli soldiers and 69 Palestinians
were killed, and hundreds wounded on both sides.
12. Reported by Drs. Eilat Mazar and Gabi Barkai, both members of the Committee for the Prevention of
Destruction of Antiquities on the Temple
Mount.
13. Berkowitz, p. 394.
14. Minutes of the Knesset State Control Committee, January 9,
2000.
15. The report is based on conversations between the
author and high-ranking police officials, members of the Antiquities Authority,
and members of the Jerusalem
municipality. It is summarized in Berkowitz, p. 395.
[1][1]6. Nadav Shragai, "Petzira be-Har Ha-bayit: be'ita be-historia ha-yehudit"
("Rubinstein: the Breach of the Temple
Mount: a Swift Kick at
Jewish History"), Ha'aretz, February 12, 1999.
17.
The announcement was made to the press in October 2007 and concerned
discoveries from the period of the First
Temple.
18. Nadav Shragai, Ha'aretz, June 19, 2006,
summary of article later printed in Ariel, "Sinun
afar hasaf memtzaim Middle
East-Bayit Rishon"
("Sifting through the rubble revealed findings from the time of the First Temple").
19. Nadav Shragai, "Luah even mantziah covesh Metzada...hitgala be-Har Ha-Bayit" ("A stone
tablet immortalizing the conqueror of Masada, discovered on the Temple Mount"),
Ha'aretz, November 1, 2006.
20.
The Chamber of Oils was where oil and wine for Temple ceremonies was stored. For example, it
stored the oil used for the Menorah of the Temple. For detailed photographs of 2007
damage to Temple Mount antiquities with Hebrew analysis,
see http://www.echad.info/bait/hnewp29-8-07.htm
21.
Israeli Court Rulings 94, p. 206, at the letters Aleph-Beit,
and p. 203, Aleph-Vav. Also found in Berkowitz, p.
396.